Keystone State Building & Loan Ass'n v. Anderson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Keystone State Building & Loan Ass'n v. Anderson

70 Pa. Super. 231, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 218

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 10, 1918·No. Appeal, No. 103·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

After due consideration of the petition, answer and testimony taken on a rule to show cause why a judgment against the defendants should not be opened, the court made the rule absolute, for reasons set out at length in a carefully prepared opinion. For the reasons therein given, and in Stoddart v. Myers, 52 Pa. Superior Ct. 179; Roeser v. German Natl. B. & L. Assn., 32 Pa. Superior Ct. 100, the assignments of error are overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

After due consideration of the petition, answer and testimony taken on a rule to show cause why a judgment against the defendants should not be opened, the court made the rule absolute, for reasons set out at length in a carefully prepared opinion. For the reasons therein given, and in Stoddart v. Myers, 52 Pa. Superior Ct. 179; Roeser v. German Natl. B. & L. Assn., 32 Pa. Superior Ct. 100, the assignments of error are overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Keystone State Building & Loan Ass'n v. Anderson, 70 Pa. Super. 231, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 218 (Pa. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

70 Pa. Super. 231 (Keystone State Building & Loan Ass'n v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related