Stockheimer v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 612

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stockheimer v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 49 Cust. Ct. 420 →

United States Customs Court·Decided March 1, 1961·No. Reap. Dec. 9929; Entry No. 753760, etc.·Published

Opinion

LawreNCe, Judge:

When the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached to and made part of this decision, were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LawreNCe, Judge:

When the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached to and made part of this decision, were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Stockheimer v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 612 (cusc 1961).

Pincite

46 Cust. Ct. 612 (Stockheimer v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.