Stockheimer v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Stockheimer v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 564

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 10, 1961

DocketReap. Dec. 9900; Entry No. 956340

StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 564 (Stockheimer v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stockheimer v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 564 (cusc 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a re-appraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a re-appraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 Cust. Ct. 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stockheimer-v-united-states-cusc-1961.