Stines v. Superior Court
424 P.2d 153, 102 Ariz. 25, 1967 Ariz. LEXIS 189
Opinion
The petition for writ of mandamus is ordered denied. The asserted impeaching evidence having been deposited with the clerk of the court in compliance with Rule XVI(c) (1) (vii), Uniform Rules of Practice, as amended February 1st, 1967, 17 A.R. S., the trial judge should examine such evidence for the purpose of determining whether it is for impeachment purposes, in accordance with our decision in Zimmerman v. Superior Court in and for Maricopa County, 98 Ariz. 85, 402 P.2d 212.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stines v. Superior Court, 424 P.2d 153, 102 Ariz. 25, 1967 Ariz. LEXIS 189 (Ark. 1967).
424 P.2d 153 (Stines v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Camelback Contractors, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
608 P.2d 782 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1980)
Fleitz v. Van Westrienen
560 P.2d 430 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1977)
City of Scottsdale v. Kokaska
495 P.2d 1327 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1972)