Stines v. Superior Court

Arizona Supreme Court

Stines v. Superior Court

424 P.2d 153, 102 Ariz. 25, 1967 Ariz. LEXIS 189

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 28, 1967

Docket8947

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 424 P.2d 153 (Stines v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stines v. Superior Court, 424 P.2d 153, 102 Ariz. 25, 1967 Ariz. LEXIS 189 (Ark. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is ordered denied. The asserted impeaching evidence having been deposited with the clerk of the court in compliance with Rule XVI(c) (1) (vii), Uniform Rules of Practice, as amended February 1st, 1967, 17 A.R. S., the trial judge should examine such evidence for the purpose of determining whether it is for impeachment purposes, in accordance with our decision in Zimmerman v. Superior Court in and for Maricopa County, 98 Ariz. 85, 402 P.2d 212.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is ordered denied. The asserted impeaching evidence having been deposited with the clerk of the court in compliance with Rule XVI(c) (1) (vii), Uniform Rules of Practice, as amended February 1st, 1967, 17 A.R. S., the trial judge should examine such evidence for the purpose of determining whether it is for impeachment purposes, in accordance with our decision in Zimmerman v. Superior Court in and for Maricopa County, 98 Ariz. 85, 402 P.2d 212.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

424 P.2d 153, 102 Ariz. 25, 1967 Ariz. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stines-v-superior-court-ariz-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack