Stilp v. O'BRIEN

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Stilp v. O'BRIEN

979 A.2d 836, 602 Pa. 189, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1401

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 28, 2009·No. Appeal 80 MAP 2007, 87 MAP 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

[190]*190 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2009, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED and Appellant’s complaint is dismissed. Appellant has failed to establish standing based on taxpayer status pursuant to the requirements set forth in Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. Commonwealth, 585 Pa. 196, 888 A.2d 655, 661 (2005); Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Commonwealth, 510 Pa. 158, 507 A.2d 323, 328 (1986); and Application of Biester, 487 Pa. 438, 409 A.2d 848 (1979).

Justice SAYLOR files a dissenting statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[190]*190 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2009, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED and Appellant’s complaint is dismissed. Appellant has failed to establish standing based on taxpayer status pursuant to the requirements set forth in Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. Commonwealth, 585 Pa. 196, 888 A.2d 655, 661 (2005); Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Commonwealth, 510 Pa. 158, 507 A.2d 323, 328 (1986); and Application of Biester, 487 Pa. 438, 409 A.2d 848 (1979).

Justice SAYLOR files a dissenting statement.

Stilp v. O'BRIEN, 979 A.2d 836, 602 Pa. 189, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1401 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

979 A.2d 836 (Stilp v. O'BRIEN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related