Stillman v. Frankel
334 N.E.2d 596, 36 N.Y.2d 899
Opinion
Ruth Stillman, Appellant,
v.
David W. Frankel, Doing Business as 6465 Realty Co., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Pamela Anagnos Liapakis, Emile Z. Berman, A. Harold Frost and Morton H. Feder for appellant.
William F. McNulty, Harold M. Foster and Anthony J. McNulty for respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.
Order affirmed, with costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stillman v. Frankel, 334 N.E.2d 596, 36 N.Y.2d 899 (N.Y. 1975).
334 N.E.2d 596 (Stillman v. Frankel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Remes v. 513 West 26th Realty, LLC
73 A.D.3d 665 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Van Orden v. St. Cecilia's Church of Rochester
298 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Fluksik v. Delmar Owners, Inc.
248 A.D.2d 667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Bucich v. City of New York
111 A.D.2d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)