Stewart v. Wainwright
This text of 206 So. 2d 211 (Stewart v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued in this cause should be discharged on the ground that petitioner has failed to show a timely pursuit of appellate remedies in proceedings presenting the same issues under Rule 1, Supreme Court Rules of Criminal Procedure, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, Stewart v. State, Fla.App., 159 So.2d 681. See Mitchell v. Wainwright, Fla.1963, 155 So.2d 868; Hillhouse v. State, Fla.1963, 159 So.2d 228; Zuniga v. State, [212]*212Fla.App. 1966, 184 So.2d 659, cert. dis. 189 So.2d 635, cert. denied 385 U.S. 962, 87 S.Ct. 404, 17 L.Ed.2d 307.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 So. 2d 211, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-wainwright-fla-1968.