Adams v. Wainwright
This text of 381 So. 2d 248 (Adams v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This cause is before us upon a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner alleges ineffective assistance of counsel and that he was not allowed to withdraw a coerced guilty plea.
Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 provides a means of relief whereby such issues may be addressed. Petitioner’s failure to assert exhaustion of this remedy precludes habeas relief. Henderson v. State, 184 So.2d 646 (Fla.1966); Zuniga v. State, 184 So.2d 659 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966), cert. denied, 189 So.2d 635 (Fla.1966), cert denied, 385 U.S. 962, 87 S.Ct. 404, 17 L.Ed.2d 307 (1966); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.
Accordingly, said petition is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
381 So. 2d 248, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 6983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-wainwright-fladistctapp-1979.