Adams v. Wainwright

381 So. 2d 248, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 6983
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 1979·No. No. SS-254·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us upon a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner alleges ineffective assistance of counsel and that he was not allowed to withdraw a coerced guilty plea.

Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 provides a means of relief whereby such issues may be addressed. Petitioner’s failure to assert exhaustion of this remedy precludes habeas relief. Henderson v. State, 184 So.2d 646 (Fla.1966); Zuniga v. State, 184 So.2d 659 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966), cert. denied, 189 So.2d 635 (Fla.1966), cert denied, 385 U.S. 962, 87 S.Ct. 404, 17 L.Ed.2d 307 (1966); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

Accordingly, said petition is denied.

MILLS, C. J., and LARRY G. SMITH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Wainwright, 381 So. 2d 248, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 6983 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

381 So. 2d 248 (Adams v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hart v. Turner
453 So. 2d 553 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Steppe v. Wainwright
384 So. 2d 155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)