Stewart v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stewart v. State

398 S.W.3d 122, 2013 WL 1901230, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 557

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stewart v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1619 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 7, 2013·No. No. ED 98862·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Taylor J. Stewart, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Taylor J. Stewart, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Stewart v. State, 398 S.W.3d 122, 2013 WL 1901230, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 557 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

398 S.W.3d 122 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.