Stewart v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stewart v. State

482 S.W.3d 892, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 236, 2016 WL 1211236

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 2016·No. No. ED 103268·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

■. Paul Stewart appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24:035 motion. for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would1 be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

■. Paul Stewart appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24:035 motion. for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would1 be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Stewart v. State, 482 S.W.3d 892, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 236, 2016 WL 1211236 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

482 S.W.3d 892 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.