Stewart v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stewart v. State

482 S.W.3d 892, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 236, 2016 WL 1211236

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 15, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103268

StatusPublished

This text of 482 S.W.3d 892 (Stewart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stewart v. State, 482 S.W.3d 892, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 236, 2016 WL 1211236 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

■. Paul Stewart appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24:035 motion. for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would1 be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

■. Paul Stewart appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24:035 motion. for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would1 be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

482 S.W.3d 892, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 236, 2016 WL 1211236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-state-moctapp-2016.