Stewart v. State

134 S.W.3d 794, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 766, 2004 WL 1151577
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 25, 2004·No. No. WD 62751·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Michael Stewart appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. Appellant was sentenced to a term of twelve years in the Missouri Department of Corrections following his plea of guilty to one count of robbery in the first degree. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. State, 134 S.W.3d 794, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 766, 2004 WL 1151577 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

134 S.W.3d 794 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.