Stewart v. State

134 S.W.3d 794, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 766, 2004 WL 1151577
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 25, 2004
DocketNo. WD 62751
StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.W.3d 794 (Stewart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. State, 134 S.W.3d 794, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 766, 2004 WL 1151577 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Michael Stewart appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. Appellant was sentenced to a term of twelve years in the Missouri Department of Corrections following his plea of guilty to one count of robbery in the first degree. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S.W.3d 794, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 766, 2004 WL 1151577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-state-moctapp-2004.