Stewart v. State
73 S.E. 602, 10 Ga. App. 442, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 552
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stewart v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 Ga. App. 501 →
Opinion
It appearing, without contradiction, from, the evidence of the prosecutor that his money was taken with his knowledge, the conviction of the plaintiff in error of the offense of larceny from the person is not sustained, and a new trial should have been granted. Moye v. State, 65 Ga. 754; Jackson v. State, 116 Ga. 578 (42 S. E. 750); Williams v. State, 70 S. E. 890 (9 Ga. App. 170).
Judgment reversed. Pottle, J., not presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stewart v. State, 73 S.E. 602, 10 Ga. App. 442, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 552 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
73 S.E. 602 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moye v. State
65 Ga. 754 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1880)
Jackson v. State
42 S.E. 750 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Williams v. State
70 S.E. 890 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)