Stewart v. State

73 S.E. 602, 10 Ga. App. 442, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 552
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 30, 1912
Docket3621
StatusPublished

This text of 73 S.E. 602 (Stewart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. State, 73 S.E. 602, 10 Ga. App. 442, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 552 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Russell, J.

It appearing, without contradiction, from, the evidence of the prosecutor that his money was taken with his knowledge, the conviction of the plaintiff in error of the offense of larceny from the person is not sustained, and a new trial should have been granted. Moye v. State, 65 Ga. 754; Jackson v. State, 116 Ga. 578 (42 S. E. 750); Williams v. State, 70 S. E. 890 (9 Ga. App. 170).

Judgment reversed. Pottle, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moye v. State
65 Ga. 754 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1880)
Jackson v. State
42 S.E. 750 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Williams v. State
70 S.E. 890 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 S.E. 602, 10 Ga. App. 442, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-state-gactapp-1912.