Stewart v. State
This text of 73 S.E. 602 (Stewart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appearing, without contradiction, from, the evidence of the prosecutor that his money was taken with his knowledge, the conviction of the plaintiff in error of the offense of larceny from the person is not sustained, and a new trial should have been granted. Moye v. State, 65 Ga. 754; Jackson v. State, 116 Ga. 578 (42 S. E. 750); Williams v. State, 70 S. E. 890 (9 Ga. App. 170).
Judgment reversed. Pottle, J., not presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 S.E. 602, 10 Ga. App. 442, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-state-gactapp-1912.