Stewart v. State

508 So. 2d 564, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1513, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8814
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 17, 1987·No. No. 4-86-1452·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion for rehearing and the motion to supplement the record. By those motions the state has now demonstrated, albeit tardily, that the appellant did enter a formal plea of guilty in a recorded proceeding before the trial court. Based on the record as supplemented by the state and the issues raised in the original and supplemental briefs filed by appellant, we now affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence and withdraw our opinion of March 4, 1987.

[565]*565ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and KLEIN, HERBERT M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. State, 508 So. 2d 564, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1513, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8814 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

508 So. 2d 564 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniel v. State
667 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)