Daniel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Daniel v. State

667 So. 2d 298, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9648, 1995 WL 540020

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 13, 1995

DocketNo. 94-1827

StatusPublished

This text of 667 So. 2d 298 (Daniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel v. State, 667 So. 2d 298, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9648, 1995 WL 540020 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD

PER CURIAM.

We grant the appellee’s motion for rehearing and the motion to supplement the record with an amended information that was inadvertently omitted from the record on appeal. See Kubernac v. Reid, 656 So.2d 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (granting rehearing on the basis of a supplemental record); Stewart v. State, 508 So.2d 564 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (same). The amended information conclusively demonstrates that the appellant was charged with possession of cannabis with the intent to distribute. Based upon the record as supplemented, we now affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence and withdraw our opirnon of June 23,1995.

ERVIN, MINER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD

PER CURIAM.

We grant the appellee’s motion for rehearing and the motion to supplement the record with an amended information that was inadvertently omitted from the record on appeal. See Kubernac v. Reid, 656 So.2d 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (granting rehearing on the basis of a supplemental record); Stewart v. State, 508 So.2d 564 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (same). The amended information conclusively demonstrates that the appellant was charged with possession of cannabis with the intent to distribute. Based upon the record as supplemented, we now affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence and withdraw our opirnon of June 23,1995.

ERVIN, MINER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 So. 2d 298, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9648, 1995 WL 540020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack