Stewart v. State

702 S.W.2d 2, 288 Ark. 117, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 1697
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stewart v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 289 Ark. 272
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 27, 1986·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Joe Willie Stewart, by his attorney, John Norman Warnock, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to his miscalculation of the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this Court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Purtle J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. State, 702 S.W.2d 2, 288 Ark. 117, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 1697 (Ark. 1986).

702 S.W.2d 2 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)