Stewart v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Stewart v. State

702 S.W.2d 2, 288 Ark. 117, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 1697

DecidedJanuary 27, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 702 S.W.2d 2 (Stewart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stewart v. State, 702 S.W.2d 2, 288 Ark. 117, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 1697 (Ark. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Joe Willie Stewart, by his attorney, John Norman Warnock, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to his miscalculation of the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this Court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Purtle J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI