Stewart v. Medina
This text of Stewart v. Medina (Stewart v. Medina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ee SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □□ Df hfe □□ GARY A. STEWART, Plaintiff, 23-CV-0880 (VB) -against- G. MEDINA, Correction Officer, employed at ORDER OF SERVICE Sing Sing Correctional Facility, Defendant. VINCENT L. BRICCETTI, United States District Judge: Plaintiff brings this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendant G. Medina, whom Plaintiff identifies as a correction officer at Sing Sing Correctional Facility (“Sing Sing”). Plaintiff alleges Defendant created a substantial risk to Plaintiff’s safety, resulting in Plaintiff being attacked by another inmate at Sing Sing. By order dated February 6, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of
DISCUSSION A, Service on Defendant Medina Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.* Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all
' Prisoners are not exempt from paying the full filing fee, even when they have been granted permission to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 2 Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served the summons and the complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that a summons be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date the summons is issued.
process... in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendant Medina through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) this defendant. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue a summons and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon Defendant Medina. If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summons is issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service), Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. B. Local Civil Rule 33.2 Local Civil Rule 33.2, which requires defendants in certain types of prisoner cases to respond to specific, court-ordered discovery requests, applies to this action. Those discovery requests are available on the Court’s website under “Forms” and are titled “Plaintiff’s Local Civil Rule 33.2 Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents.” Within 120 days of the date of this order, Defendant Medina must serve responses to these standard discovery requests. In the response, Defendant Medina must quote each request verbatim.?
3 If Plaintiff would like copies of these discovery requests before receiving the responses and does not have access to the website, Plaintiff may request them from the court’s Pro Se Intake Unit.
CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is directed to issue a summons for Defendant G. Medina, complete the USM-285 forms with the address for this defendant, and deliver to the U.S. Marshals Service all documents necessary to effect service. Local Civil Rule 33.2 applies to this action. Defendant Medina must comply with Local Civil Rule 33.2 within 120 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail an information package to Plaintiff. Dated: February 8, 2023 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED:
Vincent L.Briccetti United States District Judge
DEFENDANT AND SERVICE ADDRESS 1. Correction Officer G. Medina Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, NY 10562
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stewart v. Medina, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-medina-nysd-2023.