Stewart v. Linton
This text of 53 A. 744 (Stewart v. Linton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In her affidavit of defense Mrs. Linton does not aver that [211]*211she did not appear before the deputy consul general and separately acknowledge her power of attorney to Finlay, and her evasiveness on this point must be regarded as her admission that she did so appear and make the statutory acknowledgment. She rather relies upon her averment that her acknowledgment before the deputy consul general was invalid, in which she is mistaken, as is clearly shown by the learned judge below in his references to the several acts of assembly upon the subject. In all other respects the affidavit of defense is insufficient, and the judgment for want,of its sufficiency is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 A. 744, 204 Pa. 207, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-linton-pa-1902.