Stewart v. Ingle and Others

22 U.S. 526, 6 L. Ed. 151, 9 Wheat. 526, 1824 U.S. LEXIS 386
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 24, 1824·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

22 U.S. 526

6 L.Ed. 151

9 Wheat. 526

STEWART
v.
INGLE and others.

February 24, 1824

ERROR to the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia.

Feb. 24th.

At a former day of this term, Mr. Hay, for the plaintiff in error, had obtained a certiorari, upon a suggestion of diminution in the record, directed to the Court below, and returnable immediate. The Clerk of the Circuit Court accordingly made return to the certiorari, with another record. Whereupon, Mr. Hay moved for a new certiorari, upon the ground that the return ought to have been made by the Judge of the Court below, and not by the Clerk.

Mr. Justice WASHINGTON, after consultation with the Judges, stated, that according to the rules and practice of the Court, a return made by by the Clerk was a sufficient return.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. Ingle and Others, 22 U.S. 526, 6 L. Ed. 151, 9 Wheat. 526, 1824 U.S. LEXIS 386 (1824).

22 U.S. 526 (Stewart v. Ingle and Others) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. Louisiana Purchase Exposition Co.
102 S.W. 6 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)
Deans v. Wilcoxon
18 Fla. 531 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1882)
Worcester v. Georgia
31 U.S. 515 (Supreme Court, 1832)