Stewart v. HSBC Bank USA

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 18, 2011·No. 10-2133·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2133

SHIRLEY STEWART; LARRY STEWART,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

HSBC BANK USA; MERS, Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Incorporated; DELTA FUNDING CORPORATION, d/b/a Fidelity Mortgage; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; NECTAR PROJECTS, INCORPORATED; LAW OFFICES OF SHAPIRO & BRUNSON, LLP; RENAISSANCE MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00586-RLW)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shirley Stewart, Larry Stewart, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Shirley and Larry Stewart appeal the district court’s

order dismissing their complaint without prejudice for failure

to comply with Fed. Rules Civ. P. 8 and 9. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart v. HSBC Bank

USA, No. 3:10-cv-00586-RLW (E.D. Va. Sept. 3, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. HSBC Bank USA, (4th Cir. 2011).

Stewart v. HSBC Bank USA (Stewart v. HSBC Bank USA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.