Stewart v. HSBC Bank USA

407 F. App'x 698
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 18, 2011
DocketNo. 10-2133
StatusPublished

This text of 407 F. App'x 698 (Stewart v. HSBC Bank USA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. HSBC Bank USA, 407 F. App'x 698 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shirley and Larry Stewart appeal the district court’s order dismissing their complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with Fed. Rules Civ. P. 8 and 9. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart v. HSBC Bank USA, No. 3:10-cv-00586-RLW, 2010 WL 3522087 (E.D.Va. Sept. 3, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
407 F. App'x 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-hsbc-bank-usa-ca4-2011.