Stewart & Son v. Cook

45 S.E. 398, 118 Ga. 541, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 610
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 13, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 45 S.E. 398 (Stewart & Son v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart & Son v. Cook, 45 S.E. 398, 118 Ga. 541, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 610 (Ga. 1903).

Opinion

Lamar, J.

The written contract of sale refers to square and round bales, but is silent as to the weight of either form, or as to the customary meaning of the term. If nothing more appeared, it might be that evidence could have been introduced to show what [543]*543was the standard weight and trade meaning of square bale and round, bale. Pol. Code, § 1 (4); Civil Code, § 3675 (2). But the petition shows that the 'parties themselves agreed that the bales should be-, of a particular weight. It therefore appears that there was a parol agreement, when the law requires that the contract of sale shall be in writing (Civil Code, § 2693, par. 7); by which it of course means the entire contract, with all stipúlations and provisions which have-been assented to by the parties at the time of the sale. Where some of the terms are in writing and others in parol, the requirements of the statute are not met; and the court rightly sustained the demurrer. See Turner v. Lorillard Co., 100 Ga. 645.

Judgment affirmed.

By.five Justices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hanlon v. Hayes
89 N.E.2d 51 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1949)
Dorsey v. Clements
44 S.E.2d 783 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Durkee Famous Foods Inc. v. Selig Co.
172 S.E. 824 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Newark Fire Insurance v. Smith
167 S.E. 79 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Electric City Lumber Co. v. New York Underwriters Insurance
158 S.E. 620 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Pitts v. Edwards
139 S.E. 219 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1927)
Mason Motors Spirit Distributing Co. v. Cosden
231 P. 890 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Citizens & Southern Bank v. Union Warehouse & Compress Co.
122 S.E. 327 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Mays v. Hankinson & Hagler
120 S.E. 793 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Beck & Gregg Hardware Co. v. Hale Hardware Co.
30 Ga. App. 224 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Stapleton v. Muscogee Guano Co.
114 S.E. 906 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Shore Lumber Co. v. American Lumber & Export Co.
97 S.E. 667 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Hamby v. Truitt
81 S.E. 593 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Wagniere v. Dunnell
73 A. 309 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1909)
Spalding County v. Chamberlin & Co.
61 S.E. 533 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Watson v. Hazlehurst & McAllister
56 S.E. 459 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Borum v. Swift & Co.
53 S.E. 608 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 S.E. 398, 118 Ga. 541, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-son-v-cook-ga-1903.