Stewart & Keith v. Attaway

88 S.E. 992, 18 Ga. App. 158, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 192
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 24, 1916
Docket6961
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 88 S.E. 992 (Stewart & Keith v. Attaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart & Keith v. Attaway, 88 S.E. 992, 18 Ga. App. 158, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 192 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. The assignment of error upon the failure, of the court to direct a verdict for the defendants is without merit, as it is well settled that the refusal to direct a verdict is never reversible error.

2. The suit was trover to recover 1,520 pounds of sea-island cotton, and the evidence possibly authorized, but did not demand, a finding that that amount of cotton was in the possession of the defendants at or before the time the suit was brought. The direction of a verdict for the plaintiff was, therefore, error. Judgment reversed.

Trover; from city court of Hazlehurst — Judge Lankford presiding. August 18, 1915. J. Mark Wilcox, Bennett & Swain, P. L. Smith, for plaintiffs in error. F. Willis Dart, John Rogers Jr., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goode v. Powell
95 S.E. 738 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. Holmes-Hartsfield Co.
92 S.E. 548 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 992, 18 Ga. App. 158, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-keith-v-attaway-gactapp-1916.