Stewart & Keith v. Attaway

88 S.E. 992, 18 Ga. App. 158, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 192
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 24, 1916·No. 6961·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. The assignment of error upon the failure, of the court to direct a verdict for the defendants is without merit, as it is well settled that the refusal to direct a verdict is never reversible error.

2. The suit was trover to recover 1,520 pounds of sea-island cotton, and the evidence possibly authorized, but did not demand, a finding that that amount of cotton was in the possession of the defendants at or before the time the suit was brought. The direction of a verdict for the plaintiff was, therefore, error. Judgment reversed.

Trover; from city court of Hazlehurst — Judge Lankford presiding. August 18, 1915. J. Mark Wilcox, Bennett & Swain, P. L. Smith, for plaintiffs in error. F. Willis Dart, John Rogers Jr., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart & Keith v. Attaway, 88 S.E. 992, 18 Ga. App. 158, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 192 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

88 S.E. 992 (Stewart & Keith v. Attaway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goode v. Powell
95 S.E. 738 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. Holmes-Hartsfield Co.
92 S.E. 548 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)