Goode v. Powell
95 S.E. 738, 22 Ga. App. 239, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 267
Opinion
1. It is never reversible error for a judge to refuse to direet a verdict. Stewart v. Attaway, 18 Ga. App, 158 (88 S. E. 992); Cunningham, v. Waters, 142 Ga. 115 (82 S. E. 518).
2. No complaint is made of any ruling on the admission or rejection of evidence, and no error in the charge is alleged. The jury passed upoh the facts; the judge presiding in the superior court overruled the certiorari and thjs court will not interfere.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goode v. Powell, 95 S.E. 738, 22 Ga. App. 239, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 267 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).
95 S.E. 738 (Goode v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coastal News Co. v. Jacksonville Paper Co.
17 S.E.2d 760 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)