Goode v. Powell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Goode v. Powell

95 S.E. 738, 22 Ga. App. 239, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 267

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 12, 1918

Docket9332

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 S.E. 738 (Goode v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goode v. Powell, 95 S.E. 738, 22 Ga. App. 239, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 267 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. It is never reversible error for a judge to refuse to direet a verdict. Stewart v. Attaway, 18 Ga. App, 158 (88 S. E. 992); Cunningham, v. Waters, 142 Ga. 115 (82 S. E. 518).

2. No complaint is made of any ruling on the admission or rejection of evidence, and no error in the charge is alleged. The jury passed upoh the facts; the judge presiding in the superior court overruled the certiorari and thjs court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P- J-i and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI