Stewart Cabrera-Zamarripa v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 11, 2023
DocketA23A1253
StatusPublished

This text of Stewart Cabrera-Zamarripa v. State (Stewart Cabrera-Zamarripa v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart Cabrera-Zamarripa v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 11, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23A1253. STEWART CABRERA-ZAMARRIPA v. THE STATE.

Following a May 2022 jury trial, Stewart Cabrera-Zamarripa was found guilty of armed robbery (Count One), two counts of aggravated assault (Counts Two and Three), theft by taking (Count Four), and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony (Count Five). At the sentencing hearing, the trial court merged Counts Two and Four into Count One. Thereafter, Cabrera-Zamarripa filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court granted in part and denied in part on March 20, 2023. Specifically, the trial court ruled that Count Three should have also merged into Count One and that the defendant would be resentenced at a later date. The trial court denied the motion as to all other grounds. Prior to resentencing, Cabrera-Zamarripa filed the notice of appeal underlying the current matter. Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), a defendant has the right to directly appeal a “final judgment[], that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below.” A “case is not final and ripe for appeal until a sentence has been entered on each count of the indictment that was the subject of the trial.” Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680, 681 (571 SE2d 806) (2002). Because Cabrera-Zamarripa has not yet been re- sentenced, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and it is hereby DISMISSED. Upon entry of the re-sentencing order, the superior court clerk is DIRECTED to retransmit Cabrera-Zamarripa’s appeal. Cabrera-Zamarripa need not file a second notice of appeal, as the prematurely filed notice of appeal will ripen upon entry of the sentence. See McCulley v. State, 273 Ga. 40, 43 n.3 (4) (537 SE2d 340) (2000). Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/11/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keller v. State
571 S.E.2d 806 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2002)
McCulley v. State
537 S.E.2d 340 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stewart Cabrera-Zamarripa v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-cabrera-zamarripa-v-state-gactapp-2023.