Stevenson v. Ribicoff

297 F.2d 811
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedNovember 8, 1961
DocketNo. 36, Docket 26712
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 297 F.2d 811 (Stevenson v. Ribicoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stevenson v. Ribicoff, 297 F.2d 811 (2d Cir. 1961).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court for the reasons stated in Judge Kaufman’s opinion, 200 F.Supp. 705, as there was substantial evidence in the record to support the administrative determination of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denying the plaintiff’s application for old age benefits under 42 U.S.C.A. § 402(a). See Walker v. Altmeyer, 137 F.2d 531, 533-34 (2 Cir.1943); Poss v. Ribicoff, 289 F.2d 10 (2 Cir.1961); Gooding v. Willard, 209 F.2d 913, 916 (2 Cir.1954) ; Adams v. Flemming, 276 F.2d 901, 903 (2 Cir. 1960); Barron v. Ribicoff, 295 F.2d 432 (4 Cir.1961).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 F.2d 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevenson-v-ribicoff-ca2-1961.