Stevens v. Williams
This text of 64 N.W. 422 (Stevens v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is ruled, against the appellant, by the following recent cases in this court: Nonotuck Silk Co. v. Flanders, 87 Wis. 237; Henry v. Martin, 88 Wis. 367; Burnham v. Barth, 89 Wis. 362; Thuemmler v. Barth, 89 Wis. 381; Henika v. Heinemann, 90 Wis. 478; Gianella v. Momsen, 90 Wis. 476. By the same method and amount of proof it can be shown, with equal directness and certainty, that this fund is the particular money of each one of the several creditors of the insolvent bank. Because each one of the several creditors cannot in the nature of things have the entire fund, each must be content with his own fair share' of it.
By the Court.— The order of the circuit court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 N.W. 422, 91 Wis. 58, 1895 Wisc. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-williams-wis-1895.