Henika v. Heinemann
This text of 63 N.W. 1047 (Henika v. Heinemann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
. The order appealed from was made before the decision of Nonotuck Silk Co. v. Flanders, 87 Wis. 237, and In re Plankinton Bank, 87 Wis. 378. For the reason that the trust property or fund sought to be recovered by the petitioner could not be traced and followed into any property or money which came to the hands of the receiver, his case wholly failed. His right to recover depended upon tracing such property, or the proceeds thereof, into some property or fund which came to the hands of the receiver. Burnham v. Barth, 89 Wis. 362.
By the Court.— The order of the circuit court is reversed, •and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 N.W. 1047, 90 Wis. 478, 1895 Wisc. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henika-v-heinemann-wis-1895.