Stevens v. Stevens

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stevens v. Stevens

340 S.W.3d 350, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 553, 2011 WL 1542915

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 26, 2011

DocketWD 72660

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 340 S.W.3d 350 (Stevens v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stevens v. Stevens, 340 S.W.3d 350, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 553, 2011 WL 1542915 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Errol Stevens appeals the entry of a full order of protection under the Adult Abuse Act, §§ 455.003-455.085, RSMo, on the petition of. his wife. He claims that the trial court erred in granting the order because the court failed to make explicit findings on all of the elements necessary to support the entry of such an order. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Errol Stevens appeals the entry of a full order of protection under the Adult Abuse Act, §§ 455.003-455.085, RSMo, on the petition of. his wife. He claims that the trial court erred in granting the order because the court failed to make explicit findings on all of the elements necessary to support the entry of such an order. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

340 S.W.3d 350, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 553, 2011 WL 1542915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stevens-v-stevens-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack