Stevens v. Stevens

340 S.W.3d 350, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 553, 2011 WL 1542915
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 26, 2011·No. WD 72660·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Errol Stevens appeals the entry of a full order of protection under the Adult Abuse Act, §§ 455.003-455.085, RSMo, on the petition of. his wife. He claims that the trial court erred in granting the order because the court failed to make explicit findings on all of the elements necessary to support the entry of such an order. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stevens v. Stevens, 340 S.W.3d 350, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 553, 2011 WL 1542915 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

340 S.W.3d 350 (Stevens v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ashley v. State
340 S.W.3d 350 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)