Ashley v. State
This text of 340 S.W.3d 350 (Ashley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Franklin Ashley appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion to reopen his post-conviction proceedings. Ashley contends that the motion court erred because: (1) the amended motion filed by post-conviction counsel failed to assert sufficient facts to prove Ashley’s claims for *351 post-conviction relief; (2) the motion court improperly interpreted Rule 29.15(e) regarding post-conviction counsel’s duties; and (3) the motion court incorrectly limited the circumstances in which abandonment may be found. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
340 S.W.3d 350, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 563, 2011 WL 1542921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashley-v-state-moctapp-2011.