Stevens v. Central National Bank of Boston
23 N.Y.S. 1147, 76 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 617, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 932
Opinion
This case has been once before this court, (57 Hun, 499, 11 N. Y. Supp. 268,) upon substantially the same facts. Upon the new trial, the court, in its decision, followed the judgment and opinion of the general term, and I can see no reason for differing from that decision.
The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.
PUTNAM, J., not acting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stevens v. Central National Bank of Boston, 23 N.Y.S. 1147, 76 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 617, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 932 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
23 N.Y.S. 1147 (Stevens v. Central National Bank of Boston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stevens v. Union Trust Co.
11 N.Y.S. 268 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)