Steven Ritchie v. Leroy Kirkegard

Ninth Circuit

Steven Ritchie v. Leroy Kirkegard

622 F. App'x 632

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 6, 2015·No. 14-35532·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Petitioner Steven Ritchie appeals the dismissal of his federal habeas petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253.

At oral argument, the state conceded Ritchie’s petition was timely in light of Rogers v. Ferriter, 796 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir.2015). We therefore reverse the dis *633 trict court’s decision and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM *

Petitioner Steven Ritchie appeals the dismissal of his federal habeas petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253.

At oral argument, the state conceded Ritchie’s petition was timely in light of Rogers v. Ferriter, 796 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir.2015). We therefore reverse the dis *633 trict court’s decision and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Steven Ritchie v. Leroy Kirkegard, 622 F. App'x 632 (9th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

622 F. App'x 632 (Steven Ritchie v. Leroy Kirkegard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related