Steven Martell Collins v. Bertram Rice Attorney General of the State of California
Opinion
451 F.3d 1092
Steven Martell COLLINS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Bertram RICE; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 01-56958.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed July 7, 2006.
Steven Martell Collins, Blythe, CA, pro se.
Karyn H. Bucur, Attorney at Law, Laguna Hills, CA, Erika Denice Jackson, Esq., AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles, D.C. No. CV-98-09329-TJH.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.
Before CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, SIDNEY R. THOMAS, and RICHARD A. PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court in Rice v. Collins, ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 969, 163 L.Ed.2d 824 (2006), the judgment of the district court is affirmed. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
451 F.3d 1092 (Steven Martell Collins v. Bertram Rice Attorney General of the State of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.