Steven M. Aitken v. R. Quinn, Warden of Santa Rosa Correctional Inst.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 8, 2026·No. 1D2025-3375·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2025-3375

STEVEN M. AITKEN,

Petitioner,

v.

R. QUINN, Warden of Santa Rosa Correctional Inst., et al.,

Respondents.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Proceedings.

July 8, 2026

PER CURIAM.

As the circuit court has directed a response from the Department of Corrections and has set an evidentiary hearing on the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

ROBERTS, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Steven M. Aitken, pro se, Petitioner.

Kelly R. Forren, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Richard Comerford, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. No appearance for R. Quinn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steven M. Aitken v. R. Quinn, Warden of Santa Rosa Correctional Inst., (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Steven M. Aitken v. R. Quinn, Warden of Santa Rosa Correctional Inst. (Steven M. Aitken v. R. Quinn, Warden of Santa Rosa Correctional Inst.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)