Steven Deem v. TDCJ ID

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 28, 2005·No. 09-05-00026-CV·Published

Opinion

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



____________________



NO. 09-05-026 CV

____________________



STEVEN DEEM, Appellant



V.



TDCJ-ID, ET AL., Appellees



On Appeal from the 60th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B-172965



MEMORANDUM OPINION (1)

On March 10, 2005, we notified the parties that the order signed by the trial judge did not appear to be a final order. The appellant filed a response in which he argues we have interlocutory appellate jurisdiction because the order ends the litigation as to three of the defendants. Subject to certain statutory exceptions not applicable in this case, only final judgments are appealable. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.012, 51.014 (Vernon 1997 & Supp. 2005). The order of dismissal did not dispose of all issues and parties and did not contain unmistakable language of finality. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 206 (Tex. 2001); Vacca v. Glass, 148 S.W.3d 207 (Tex. App.- Texarkana 2004, pet. denied). The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered April 28, 2005

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.

1. Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steven Deem v. TDCJ ID, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Steven Deem v. TDCJ ID (Steven Deem v. TDCJ ID) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Angel M. Vacca v. Zelda Glass
148 S.W.3d 207 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)