Steve McCraw v. Ricardo Valdez Gomez, Jr.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 11, 2014·No. 01-13-00573-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-00573-CV Style: Steve McCraw v. Ricardo Valdez Gomez, Jr. Date motion filed*: March 10, 2014 Type of motion: Unopposed Motion for Second Extension of Time to File Brief of Appellee Party filing motion: Appellee Document to be filed: Appellee’s brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: October 28. 2013 Number of previous extensions granted: 1 Current Due date: March 6, 2014 Date Requested: March 13, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due: Wednesday, April 2, 2014  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________

Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Jim Sharp 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: March 11, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steve McCraw v. Ricardo Valdez Gomez, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Steve McCraw v. Ricardo Valdez Gomez, Jr. (Steve McCraw v. Ricardo Valdez Gomez, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.