Steve McCraw v. Ricardo Valdez Gomez, Jr.

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-00573-CV Style: Steve McCraw v Ricardo Valdez Gomez, Jr. Date motion filed*: August 29, 2013 Type of motion: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: August 29, 2013 Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: August 29, 2013 Date Requested: 15 days after filing of a supplemental clerk’s record

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted in part If document is to be filed, document due: Monday, September 30, 2013  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ The motion is granted is part. Appellant’s brief is due no later than Monday, September 30, 2013.

Judge's signature: _____________________________________________ 

Panel consists of /s/ Justice Jim Sharp

Date: September 9, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision