Steve Eagleton v. Athens Marine, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 12, 2014
DocketA15A0560
StatusPublished

This text of Steve Eagleton v. Athens Marine, Inc. (Steve Eagleton v. Athens Marine, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steve Eagleton v. Athens Marine, Inc., (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 11, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0560. STEVE EAGLETON v. ATHENS MARINE, INC. A15A0561. STEVE EAGLETON v. MICHIGAN MOTORZ. A15A0562. STEVE EAGLETON v. MALIBU BOATS, LLC.

Steve Eagleton filed suit against numerous defendants, including Athens Marine, Inc., Michigan Motorz, Malibu Boats, LLC., and three other defendants. In separate orders, the trial court dismissed defendants Athens Marine, Michigan Motorz, and Malibu Boats, and Eagleton filed these three direct appeals. “In a case involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties is not a final judgment.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Johnson v. Hosp. Corp. of America, 192 Ga. App. 628, 629 (385 SE2d 731) (1989). Under such circumstances, there must be “an express determination that there is no just reason for delay” under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b), or there must be compliance with the interlocutory appeal requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Where neither of these code sections are followed, the appeal is premature and must be dismissed. Here, it appears that Eagleton’s claims against other defendants remain pending, and because the orders Eagleton seeks to appeal do not reference OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) or make an express determination that there is no just reason for delay, the orders cannot be viewed as final. Hadid v. Beals, 233 Ga. App. 5, 6 (502 SE2d 798) (1998). Accordingly, Eagleton was required to follow the interlocutory review procedures in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over these appeals, which are hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 12/11/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Hospital Corporation of America
385 S.E.2d 731 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Hadid v. Beals
502 S.E.2d 798 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Steve Eagleton v. Athens Marine, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steve-eagleton-v-athens-marine-inc-gactapp-2014.