Steve Benny v. Danny Pipes

Ninth Circuit

Steve Benny v. Danny Pipes

807 F.2d 1514, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 18313

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 16, 1987

Docket85-2347

StatusPublished

Cited by48 cases

This text of 807 F.2d 1514 (Steve Benny v. Danny Pipes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Steve Benny v. Danny Pipes, 807 F.2d 1514, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 18313 (9th Cir. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The court’s opinion in this case filed September 5,1986, 799 F.2d 489, is amended as follows:

At page 495, the parenthetical after the citation to Meredith v. Arizona, 523 F.2d 481, 482-83 (9th Cir.1975), which reads “single blow by guard is a substantive due process violation,” is amended to read “single blow by a guard can be a substantive due process violation.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The court’s opinion in this case filed September 5,1986, 799 F.2d 489, is amended as follows:

At page 495, the parenthetical after the citation to Meredith v. Arizona, 523 F.2d 481, 482-83 (9th Cir.1975), which reads “single blow by guard is a substantive due process violation,” is amended to read “single blow by a guard can be a substantive due process violation.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

807 F.2d 1514, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 18313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steve-benny-v-danny-pipes-ca9-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack