Stettauer v. Boldenweck

55 N.E. 709, 183 Ill. 187
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided December 18, 1899·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Magruder

delivered the opinion of the court;

Upon looking into the record, we find that the amount involved is less than $1000.00; and the record contains no certificate of importance. In a case of this character, where the amount involved is less than $1000.00, the judgment of the Appellate Court, in the absence of a certificate of importance, is final, and the writ of error 'must be dismissed. (Jordan v. Moore, 128 Ill. 56; Moore v. Sweeney, 128 id. 204).

The amount involved in this litigation is clearly to be measured by the amount .of the claim of the plaintiffs in error, as stated in their petition, and not by the value of the property sold at the sale, which is sought to be set aside. If both claims of the plaintiffs in error, described in their petition, be added together, they amount to only $665.71. As the amount claimed is less than $1000.00, this court has no jurisdiction to review the decision of the Appellate Court. The statute has madeathe decision of the Appellate Court final in such cases. (Walker v. Malin, 94 Ill. 596; Piper v. Jacobson, 98 id. 389; Akin v. Cassiday, 105 id. 22; Aultman v. Weir, 134 id. 137; Farwell v. Becker, 129 id. 261).

Accordingly, the writ of error is dismissed.

Writ dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stettauer v. Boldenweck, 55 N.E. 709, 183 Ill. 187 (Ill. 1899).

55 N.E. 709 (Stettauer v. Boldenweck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United Cigar-Whelan Stores Corp. v. Delaware Liquor Commission
15 A.2d 442 (New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1940)
Merritt v. Crane Co.
80 N.E. 103 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1906)
M. Pugh Co. v. Wallace
64 N.E. 1005 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1902)
Davis v. Upham & Stone
61 N.E. 76 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1901)