Stern Unemployment Compensation Case
This text of 168 A.2d 605 (Stern Unemployment Compensation Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This is an unemployment compensation appeal in which the Bureau of Employment Security, the Referee, and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, all concluded that the claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits under the provisions of §402(b) of the law, 43 PS §802(b), in that he voluntarily terminated his employment without cause of a necessitous and compelling reason.
[406]*406The claimant, Bernard Stern, was last employed as a bartender by P.B.J. Bars, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on June 30, 1959. He was secretary of the Corporation and owned 50% of the stock. Two of the stockholders, one of whom was his brother, each owned 25% of the stock. He was the only working stockholder. On June 22, 1959, he sold his interest to the other two stockholders for the sum of $36,500 and voluntarily left the business. In doing so, it is clear that the claimant did bring about the termination of this technical employment with the corporate entity.
The facts in this ease are similar, and it is controlled by our decision in Charney Unemployment Compensation Case, 194 Pa. Superior Ct. 402, 168 A. 2d 604. See also: Hamburg Unemployment Compensation Case, 192 Pa. Superior Ct. 598, 162 A. 2d 55 (1960); Murray Unemployment Compensation Case, 193 Pa. Superior Ct. 464, 165 A. 2d 273 (1960).
Decision affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 A.2d 605, 194 Pa. Super. 405, 1961 Pa. Super. LEXIS 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stern-unemployment-compensation-case-pasuperct-1961.