Stepp, Ex Parte Earl

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 17, 2013
DocketAP-77,011
StatusPublished

This text of Stepp, Ex Parte Earl (Stepp, Ex Parte Earl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stepp, Ex Parte Earl, (Tex. 2013).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-77,011

EX PARTE EARL STEPP, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. F-2010-1176-E IN THE 367TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DENTON COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of

aggravated assault and one count of assault family violence. He was sentenced to twelve years’

imprisonment on each count. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his convictions violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the

US Constitution. Both counts of assault were alleged to have been committed against the same

victim on the same day and involved the same criminal act. Each victim constitutes the allowable 2

unit of prosecution under the Texas assault statute. See Ex parte Cavazos, 203 S.W.3d 333, 337

(Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (citing to Philips v. State, 787 S.W.2d 39, 394–95 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)

and comparing assault to burglary wherein the unlawful entry is the allowable unit of prosecution).

We agree with the trial court’s conclusion that Applicant has suffered multiple punishments for the

same offense. Applicant is entitled to relief.

Relief is granted. The judgment in Count II of Cause No. F-2010-1176-E in the 367th Judicial

District Court of Denton County is vacated and set aside. All remaining issues challenging the

judgment in count one are denied.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Parole Division.

Delivered: April 17, 2013 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Cavazos
203 S.W.3d 333 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Philipp Bros., Inc. v. Oil Country Specialists, Ltd.
787 S.W.2d 38 (Texas Supreme Court, 1990)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stepp, Ex Parte Earl, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stepp-ex-parte-earl-texcrimapp-2013.