Stepniak v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
This text of 96 N.Y.S. 1147 (Stepniak v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained, and motion for new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff to abide event. Held, that the questions of defendant’s negligence and absence of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff are questions of fact which should have been submitted to the jury.
McLennan, P., and NASH JJ., dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 N.Y.S. 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stepniak-v-lake-shore-michigan-southern-railway-co-nyappdiv-1906.