Stepniak v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
96 N.Y.S. 1147
Opinion
Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained, and motion for new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff to abide event. Held, that the questions of defendant’s negligence and absence of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff are questions of fact which should have been submitted to the jury.
McLennan, P., and NASH JJ., dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stepniak v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co., 96 N.Y.S. 1147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).
96 N.Y.S. 1147 (Stepniak v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.