Stepniak v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

110 A.D. 923

Opinion

— Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained ana motion for new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff to abide event. Held, that the questions of defendant’s negligence and absence of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff are questions of fact ivhich'should have" been submitted to the jury. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., and Nash, J., who dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stepniak v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co., 110 A.D. 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

110 A.D. 923 (Stepniak v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.