Stephens v. State
169 S.W.3d 580, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1231, 2005 WL 2007882
Opinion
ORDER
Nathaniel Stephens appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Upon review of the parties’ briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stephens v. State, 169 S.W.3d 580, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1231, 2005 WL 2007882 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).
169 S.W.3d 580 (Stephens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beattie v. State
169 S.W.3d 580 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)