Beattie v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Beattie v. State

169 S.W.3d 580, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1230, 2005 WL 2007885

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 23, 2005·No. WD 64463·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael L. Beattie appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. Mr. Beattie sought to vacate his convictions for the class A felony of murder in the second degree, section 565.021, RSMo 2000, and the class D felony of endangering the welfare of a child in the first degree, section 568.045, RSMo 2000, respectively. He claims that his guilty plea was unknowing, unintelligent, and involuntary because plea counsel misled him regarding the sentence the court would im *581 pose. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael L. Beattie appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. Mr. Beattie sought to vacate his convictions for the class A felony of murder in the second degree, section 565.021, RSMo 2000, and the class D felony of endangering the welfare of a child in the first degree, section 568.045, RSMo 2000, respectively. He claims that his guilty plea was unknowing, unintelligent, and involuntary because plea counsel misled him regarding the sentence the court would im *581 pose. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Beattie v. State, 169 S.W.3d 580, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1230, 2005 WL 2007885 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

169 S.W.3d 580 (Beattie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related