Stephens v. State
861 So. 2d 520, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19239, 2003 WL 22964287
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stephens v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 829 So. 2d 945 →
Opinion
Lonnie Stephens seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to terminate his probation because he has fulfilled his restitution obligation. We deny the petition without prejudice to Stephens filing a motion to terminate his probation in the trial court upon the completion of the in-[521]*521carcerative portion of his sentence and the commencement of his probation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stephens v. State, 861 So. 2d 520, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19239, 2003 WL 22964287 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
861 So. 2d 520 (Stephens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.