Stephens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stephens v. State

861 So. 2d 520, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19239, 2003 WL 22964287

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 18, 2003

DocketNo. 1D03-2876

StatusPublished

This text of 861 So. 2d 520 (Stephens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stephens v. State, 861 So. 2d 520, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19239, 2003 WL 22964287 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Stephens seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to terminate his probation because he has fulfilled his restitution obligation. We deny the petition without prejudice to Stephens filing a motion to terminate his probation in the trial court upon the completion of the in-[521]*521carcerative portion of his sentence and the commencement of his probation.

BARFIELD, ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lonnie Stephens seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to terminate his probation because he has fulfilled his restitution obligation. We deny the petition without prejudice to Stephens filing a motion to terminate his probation in the trial court upon the completion of the in-[521]*521carcerative portion of his sentence and the commencement of his probation.

BARFIELD, ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

861 So. 2d 520, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19239, 2003 WL 22964287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.