Stephens v. Fitzgerald
131 S.E. 885, 161 Ga. 842, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 345
This text of 131 S.E. 885 (Stephens v. Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stephens v. Fitzgerald, 131 S.E. 885, 161 Ga. 842, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 345 (Ga. 1926).
Opinion
The exercise of the discretion of the judge in granting or refusing a temporary injunction upon interlocutory hearing will not be controlled, unless it is manifest that there has been an abuse of discretion. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Moody v. Burrell
146 S.E. 753 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
131 S.E. 885, 161 Ga. 842, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-fitzgerald-ga-1926.